Pascal Najadi, a retired Swiss banker, successfully filed a civil lawsuit against Pfizer on March 6.
Najadi, a triple-vaccinated Swiss-British citizen, filed a lawsuit in the US Supreme Court in the state of New York against the FDA, Pfizer and Swiss President Alain Berset, who was previously Switzerland’s health minister.
Najadi, who was also placed under US military protection, said: “We are dealing with, uh, I’m sorry to say, mass murder.”
Disclosure report: This lawsuit, unthinkable and futile in some countries, could be a key case in exposing the deception and fraud behind the global injection campaign and has the potential to cause the collapse of the “Corona House of Cards,” the International Crimes Investigation Committee said.
This latest lawsuit follows a report Najadi filed in December 2022 against Swiss President Alain Berset — who is also the head of the Interior Department and former health minister — at his local police station. This investigation is still ongoing.
#USA #Switzerland #GreatBritain #Berset #Justice #USA #SupremeCourt #Najadi #PfizerExposed
— Pascal Najadi ⚡️ (@Bitcoin1967) March 6, 2023
🇨🇭⚡️🇬🇧⚡️🇺🇸
B R E A K I N G N E W S
Swiss President 🇨🇭@alain_berset has been named in a lawsuit along with Pfizer/FDA, in the United States of America 🇺🇸https://t.co/9Wmy9jWJe0
During an interview with AJ Roberts, Najadi spoke about his latest case, against Pfizer, which includes the first, criminal investigation against Berset. The interview began with the reading of a press release dated March 7, 2023:
“Swiss President Alain Berset has been named in a lawsuit along with Pfizer in the United States over claims that: “The corona vaccine is effective for at least 12 months, much longer than previously thought. That’s good news and all the more reason to sign up for the vaccine.”
“One of the applicants presented a copy of his vaccination passport and vaccination records. The lawsuit is based on a complaint filed by Pascal Najadi, a British/Swiss citizen, and an administrative judgment filed in the United Kingdom by law firm [OV Makker]”.
We previously wrote about the administrative ruling that Najadi refers to above, filed by the British parenting group UsForThem.
On March 3, “we wrote to [Pfizer’s] law firm partners, Davis Polk … it went to the Honorable Justices [ ] of the New York State Supreme Court,” Najadi said. And then he read the letter. We have included the text of this letter after the video below. Najadi continued, declining to provide any details about the lawsuit because it is pending:
“On Friday, we informed Pfizer through lawyers and the court. The courts before that date did not know what our intention was. We launched a preemptive strike against Pfizer.
“Secondly, we went on Monday morning, at 9 o’clock, we went to court – the Supreme Court of the State of New York in Manhattan – and showed our evidence and copies of the ongoing Swiss criminal case against the Swiss president, Alain Berset, for abuse of office etc. violation of four, in my case, articles of the Swiss Criminal Code”.
“The New York judge’s approval for the case to proceed is significant because many people have tried and failed to get the judge’s approval … to file a lawsuit against Pfizer. Against Pfizer in the Supreme Court… it will cause a domino effect… The evidence is clear as day. They would have to claim that it is night when the sun is out and vice versa… and that is quite impossible”.
Given that Pfizer has stated in previous court proceedings that they “did not defraud the government, but delivered a government-ordered fraud,” Najadi is aware that he is fighting not only Pfizer, but also the US Department of Defense and the US government. .
So the judge issued a temporary restraining order to protect the lawyers, himself, wife and mother. In issuing the restraining order and delivering it to the embassy in Switzerland, the US Department of Justice mandates that the Swiss government must ensure that “not one hair is missing from my body [or compromised in any way],” Najadi said.
Acting Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has also received the same instructions from the US Department of Justice, so that if Najadi travels to the UK, he and his family have the same protection.
Pismo 3. ožujka 2023.
Poštovani savjetnici Pfizera,
Prema uputama ovog suda, prije nego što se može izdati privremena zabrana prilaska, ona mora biti uručena optuženicima Pfizera u predmetu Davis Polk. U prilogu se nalazi kopija tužbe gosp. Pascal Najadi, britansko/švicarski državljanin, podnesena i na čekanju u Švicarskoj.
Poput Paname, Švicarska je provela naredbu o lockoutu, naredbu o cijepljenju Pfizera i QR kod quid pro quo koji je ograničio i obespravio svoje građane u različitim oblicima, uključujući višestruka zatvaranja. Pfizer je ostvario veliku prodaju tijekom ove narudžbe.
Pfizer, američka korporacija sa sjedištem u Sjedinjenim Američkim Državama, prekršila je savezne i državne zakone SAD-a i druge. U Sjedinjenim Državama, jedina narudžba za Covid-19 postoji zbog prethodnih ugovora koje su potpisali radnici Medicaid Medicare pod nazivom CMS (CMS ugovor).
- CMS ugovor je trebao biti poništen jer radnici CMS-a nisu bili upoznati s klauzulama i stoga je bio lažan
- Ugovor o CMS-u bio je na snazi prije pandemije covida, a potpisivanje ugovora od strane jedne strane, HHS-a, izravan je sukob interesa kojeg strane (zaposlenici, djelatnici Medicare u bolnicama, liječničke ordinacije) ne bi trebale biti obvezne poštovati ih.
- Stoga su nalozi CMS-a prekršili prava iz 1. amandmana i nametnuli odvojena, ali jednaka izuzeća i pravo na informirani pristanak treće strane.
- Budući da je ugovor postojao prije cjepiva i slijepog potpisivanja ugovora bez znanja o odricanju naših prava, prisilna cijepljenja krše savezne i državne zakone SAD-a i pravo na afirmativnu akciju informiranog pripauza.