Many of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals “sound like” worthy ideals, for example, who could object to the goal of eradicating world poverty? In this article, we attempt to decode the true meaning of the false marketing language of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Decoding the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals can be a little tricky, especially with all the weapons they use. Many of these goals may be unattainable, but for the global elite, it’s not about improving the world, it’s about controlling it and controlling you. Of course, the price of this delusional “planetary utopia” is handing over control of all planetary resources to unelected dictators in the UN for supposed “protection”.
A true ecological approach has been hijacked by the deceptive political schemes of the UN
The policies of the UN on climate change, sustainable development and the green economy in the past 30 years are little more than global marketing gimmicks that have tragically brainwashed two generations of people who do not understand what the UN really is and who it is supposed to serve. .
The word “sustainable” was stolen decades ago and is now being falsely used to promote the agenda of globalist mega-corporate interests who don’t care about the environment.
The goal is to catapult humanity into the arms of the UN Agenda 2030 and other deceptive marketing schemes fully in line with the goals of the so-called financial elites of the World Economic Forum (WEF) group in Davos. The UN Agenda 2030 is not about real environmental protection, but about intimidating people into accepting totalitarian rule and restrictions on their freedom and personal well-being.
Pseudo-sustainable “development”
What the UN actually means by ‘sustainable development’ is population control, central planning, global governance and education to indoctrinate your children into new beliefs in preparation for a new fake ‘sustainable’ world order.
The “real sustainability” movement has been hijacked by the UN’s fraudulent political schemes on sustainable development and the ideology of man-made climate change, as this article shows, including the video testimony of whistleblower George Hunt.
Note also that sustainable development as defined by the UN actually supports the dishonest debt money banking and flawed economic system of globalization/hypergrowth; and that during the last 30 years of sustainable development as defined by the UN, it has not addressed the real environmental and human welfare problems that exist around the world.
Sustainable development as defined by the UN is and always has been a fake story that operates under the guise of continuous ecologically destructive globalization.
Sustainable development is not real sustainability at all – it is a political and economic scheme that distracts from what real ecological development is.
Part of the problem is that globalization does not distinguish between what might be called “good growth” and “bad, environmentally and socially destructive growth”.
Any growth will mean to the international money masters that without GDP growth, their entire system of monetary tricks will collapse. Therefore, globalization was the vehicle that enabled decades of interest payments in which trillions flowed continuously into the privately owned megabanks of the world, regardless of whether the “economy” expanded or contracted.
The megabanks that pull the strings of the economy are always the winners in the numerous boom-bust-bailout scenarios that have befallen the governments of the world.
The winner: the financial orthodoxy of private bankers
Debt money banking and the globalization/hyper-growth economic paradigm has had seriously damaging environmental and social consequences for decades. The financial winner in this paradigm was the financial orthodoxy of the private bankers.
Everyone else is on the debt treadmill, forced to join the “rat race” or “hamster wheel” to pay interest on the debt private bankers created out of thin air. There is never enough money in the system to pay the interest on the increasing debt, so the whole system is a fraud.
It resembled a sadistic game of musical chairs in which everyone competes for a place while private bankers sit on the throne of the world’s money creation process. From its unelected office of money creation, the global private banking system has for decades extracted an estimated 35% of the total profits of the nations of the world through the mechanisms of debt, interest and government taxation (most of which goes to pay interest on national debts).
The private banking sector creates vast amounts of debt out of thin air and lends it around the world at interest. Control of this mechanism allowed the private banking sector to expand or contract the economy at will, creating boom-bust-bailout cycles in which the bankers always won, to the detriment of the environment and the general population.
These controlled cycles are explained in the book The Demonic Economy.
Hypergrowth has resulted in real destruction and pollution of the environment. No UN policy ever mentions this or attempts to reform the privately owned debt system that is at the root of real-world environmental and human welfare problems.
The UN did not cause globalization, it actually represented globalization and was part of the globalization machinery for decades; and the political schemes and ideologies of the mega-corporation group WEF Davos.
The UN’s politically defined “sustainable development” was an illusory “greenwashing” of the current flawed system, temporarily sustaining a system that will eventually fail due to its unsustainable, “ecocidal” effects that reduce human well-being.
The UN’s 2030 agenda includes a plan to move all people from the countryside into so-called smart cities where they will be monitored, controlled and monitored; Furthermore, being forced to comply with the new rules for accessing digital social credits; and unable to grow enough food.
This is also detailed in the World Economic Forum document “The Great Reset”. Free creative people have no idea that they will be confined or confined in cities like penned cattle or under the control of an unelected UN and a government-business partnership, but that is exactly what the UN’s Agenda 2030 is trying to do.
True sustainability would include the development of self-sufficiency in localities and regions and a complete overhaul of the education system to re-establish the truth, as well as material, health and spiritual knowledge for successful networks and human well-being.
A technocratic future at the service of corporations
This is contrary to the systems of the so-called globalized economy or the technocratic corporate future that the WEF, UN and government bureaucrats have planned for us. True sustainability would not be prevented by debt banking and endless taxation, in which much of the tax goes directly to the international mega-banks and financial institutions that have the unearned privilege of creating money.
” The slogan of UN Agenda 21, to protect the rights of future generations and all species from the potential crimes of the present, is both a smokescreen and a statement of demand. Standing on this high-sounding platform, individual rights are called selfish, and those who would fight for them are denounced as immoral.” – Rosa Koire, author.
The environmentalists and green politicians who enthusiastically support the UN’s 2030 Agenda policies have yet to come out of the UN’s marketing propaganda and fake science about human-caused climate change. If they understood what the UN really is and what the “real” agenda is, they would certainly not support the 2030 Agenda.
” UN Agenda 21/sustainable development is an action plan implemented worldwide to inventory and control all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all buildings, all means of production, all energy, all education, of all information and all human beings in the world…Furthermore, people should be collected from villages and packed into human settlements or islands of human habitation, close to work centers and transportation (where they can be tracked and controlled)…
The UN’s Agenda 21/sustainable development is a global plan implemented locally. More than 600 cities in the US are members… Costs are paid by taxpayers…. Although counties say they encourage agricultural use, consumption of locally produced food, farmers markets, etc., in reality there are so many regulations that limit water and land use (there are scenic corridors, land rural corridors, bay corridors, spatial plans, specific plans, redevelopment plans , huge fees, fines) for farmers to lose their land completely…
The goal is for people to leave the village, become more dependent, come to the cities…
The plan is to limit your choices, limit your resources, curtail your freedom and take away your voice…” – Rosa Koire, author.
Deciphering the real goals of the 15 “New Sustainable Development Goals” of the United Nations
“Agenda 2030 is comparable to chasing imaginary giraffes and embodied in a collective movement, because it calls on individuals to put aside their ambitions, lose their natural rights and submit to the state – probably for the 17 lofty goals of unelected globalists.
“Agenda 2030 is comparable to chasing imaginary giraffes and embodied in a collective movement, because it calls on individuals to put aside their ambitions, lose their natural rights and submit to the state – probably for the 17 lofty goals of unelected globalists.
Agenda 2030 represents a real threat to life
as you know it because the supposed attempts of the United Nations to secure peace and ensure domestic peace and equality for all are intoxicating because they play on Maslow’s instinctive human need for security above all other desires. … when faced with threats … free men willingly give up their liberties and accept tyranny if their new guardians can ensure their safety.
This, in my opinion, is what the United Nations is trying to achieve in its 2030 Agenda… For those who are not well informed… (17) goals is a beacon of hope. But to critical thinkers and lovers of freedom…they are the overarching and tyrannical arms of the nanny state—run by a group of elites who will never live up to the limited standards and lost rights they impose on their willing subjects” – Ron Taylor, author
Let’s take a closer look at the goals of sustainable development:
Goal 1: Eradicate poverty in all its forms everywhere
translation:
Keep the developing world in massive debt under the guise of economic development, globalization and “technology transfer programs” sold with the illusory goal of eradicating poverty.
The disastrous effect of such policies has actually been to increase debt and poverty in the so-called developing world, as described in the book Transcending the Climate Change Deception Toward Real Sustainability.
Centralized banking, the IMF, the World Bank, the Federal Reserve to continue to control all world finances. The so-called financial powers (PTBs) will cancel the world debt (on money they created out of thin air) when they can implement their digital world currency, social credit system and cashless society, ensuring that people will have to follow their rules.
Goal 2: Eradicate hunger, achieve food security and better nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture
2.5 By 2020, conserve the genetic diversity of seeds, cultivated plants and domestic and domestic animals and their wild relatives, including properly managed and diversified seed and plant banks at the national, regional and international levels, and promote access to and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their use genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge, according to international agreement.
Translation: The rise of GMOs and the absence of local control of seed banks “as internationally agreed” means mega-corporate control of genetic resources.
In contrast to past centuries, when people shared common property, in modern times practically everything is privatized and people do not dispose of or own anything. The common use of common property no longer refers to the world’s land and water, nature, seeds or (airwaves).
Even life itself is being privatized through the patenting and biopiracy of genes, food, plants, animals, biodiversity and natural resources and life forms – including pathogens, genetic markers and viruses. In almost all cases, you will find it owned by corporations. While all these natural resources were called common and were shared and used by all.
Major pesticide and GMO megacorporations include BASF, Bayer Dupont, Dow Chemical, Monsanto, and Syngenta.
They own a huge number of seed, pesticide and biotech companies. Monsanto was responsible for the introduction of GM crops and toxic chemicals such as aspartame, DDT, Agent Orange, petroleum-based fertilizers, rGBH, glyphosate and more. Furthermore, such companies engage in the ungodly corporate practice of patenting nature itself.
It displaced thousands of years of traditional agriculture and farmers’ rights. The World Trade Organization’s Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) allowed the granting of patents for all genetic material, including seeds, plants and animals.
“In May 2002, there were 1,457 biotech companies in the US with a total value of $224 billion…consolidation is acute, 70% of patents on basic food crops are owned by six multinational corporations, which can set the market price for them and exclude competition for 20 years, monopolizing the market…
Biopiracy
The developing world, where 75% of people’s livelihoods depend on agriculture, is the source of 90% of all biological resources. However, multinational companies based in developed countries own 97% of global patents… Patenting life is the opposite of sharing knowledge and protecting biodiversity and culture” – Dr. Sahadeva das, author
As a result, farmers in developing countries are now not allowed to store seed without paying corporations for the privilege. Who gave corporations that privilege? This problem is known as “biopiracy”. In India, millions of farmers borrowed money to buy GMO seeds produced by companies that were about 1,000 times more expensive than conventional seeds, but when the crops failed, these farmers were left with huge debts. The situation was made worse by the fact that GMO seeds contain terminator technology, so farmers had to buy new seeds every year. This crisis reportedly led to more than 250,000 farmers committing suicide in India between 1995 and 2009, see note.
Goal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
3.7 By 2030, ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health care services, including family planning, information and education, and the inclusion of reproductive health in national strategies and programs.
3.8 By 2030, universal health coverage, including financial risk protection, access to quality basic health services and access to safe, effective, quality and affordable essential medicines and vaccines for all. 3.b Support for research and development of vaccines and medicines for infectious and non-infectious diseases that primarily affect developing countries.
Translation: Mass vaccination, mass abortion and population control. For evidence of the devastating effects and deaths from the Covid-19 vaccination, see No worries, no virus
Goal 4: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
By 2030, ensure that all students acquire the knowledge and skills necessary to support sustainable development, including through education in the field of sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles, human rights, gender equality, promotion of a culture of peace and non-violence, global citizenship and appreciation of cultural diversity…
Translation: UN propaganda and brainwashing through compulsory education from “cradle to grave”. All students must be indoctrinated about sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles.
What is a sustainable lifestyle? It is partially consistent with the false UN doctrine that CO2 or methane emissions from cows cause climate change. The word “safe” is also an open admission of forced indoctrination. How do they want to implement it?
Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
Ensure full and effective participation of women and equal opportunities for leadership at all levels of decision-making in political, economic and public life.
Adopt and strengthen sound policies and enforceable legislation to promote gender equality and empower all women and girls at all levels.”
Tax slavery for both sexes
Translation: I, and certainly everyone, completely agree, of course, that women and all people should be paid equally for equal work. But there is a deeper story that needs to be noticed, and that is the story of the tax system.
Once you understand the tax system, you may begin to realize that the UN’s goal of “gender equality” is not as noble an endeavor as it may seem.
It is actually about imposing tax tricks on both sexes “equally” and adding another 2 billion people to the tax base.
The “powers that be” not only want billions of men to work as tax slaves, but also billions of women who used to work as tax slaves. These are emotionally sensitive issues and it is not easy for many people to accept that we have been misled about the true motives of the UN and what is behind the government’s policy in relation to gender equality. He stated that
The Rockefeller banking dynasty planned and financed the modern feminist movement and the political roots of gender equality
specifically for reasons that include: Social engineering to destroy the traditional family union where parents had the main influence on the child, i.e. all control of society and children would be under the auspices of the state and so that children could be indoctrinated from a young age with state values; population control to be achieved through forced “family planning”; turn women into taxpayers; and prevent women from bearing children.
“Men and women will only be allowed to work in this world, to earn money for themselves and their families, if they pay roughly 80% of their earnings to wealthy, privately owned international mega-banks and a national government bureaucracy fully equipped to conform to the dictates and the policies of those megabanks and obey them.’
Do you think that is fair? Do you think it’s something to campaign for? However, it is a close approximation of what is actually happening in the current global government and tax system through direct and hidden taxes.
Tragically, the whole process, which was financed by megabanks, also resulted in a kind of political split or mental tension between some men and women.
It seems to me that all men and all women would do better to work together to eliminate fraudulent systems of taxation and bank usury. Then women, men and all working families would have much more money in their pockets,
because they would no longer need the trillions of dollars annually paid to international megabanks as interest on national debts. albeit collected from the people in the form of taxes.
Keep in mind that in recent centuries, people have been forced to accept the fraud of ever-higher income tax rates. Few people realize that the government usually takes about 80% of your total income. That 80% is taken through various tax mechanisms that affect your personal income and the money you spend on products.
All consumer products have a large amount of hidden tax built into their retail price. This hidden input tax has accumulated at each of the multiple stages of the product supply chain.
In addition, for decades roughly one-quarter to one-half of 80% of taxes go directly from the government to international megabanks and private financial institutions to pay interest on borrowing from the national debt.
This debt money was created by these banks out of nothing and therefore the national debt is a lie and a fraud.
The important thing that governments and the UN don’t tell you is that this means you work for free as a slave to the government for about nine and a half months a year, ie you only get to keep about two and a half months of your annual income for yourself.
The truth about the tax system
When you understand the truth about the tax system, you may begin to understand that the UN’s goal in gender equality is not primarily to ensure equal pay rights for women, but primarily to condition women to be a willing and enthusiastic part of today’s fraudulent world.
Being part of a tax system so that roughly 80% of women’s earnings go directly to the government. Neither men nor women would certainly disagree with that. Men and women who understand this would certainly not agree to have around 80% of their earnings taken away through direct and hidden taxes.
UN gender equality is not so much about gender equality, but primarily about supporting and ensuring tax slavery for all equally.
For thousands of years, women and men have always worked, although often in different ways and in different roles. The state tax system has been secretly imposed on the population for the past centuries. The UN does not want women (or men) to work for themselves outside of an oppressive tax system.
Of course women and men should work if they want and for equal pay for equal work, but why pay 80% of taxes? Do you see the trick? Do you see why the UN wants to control the whole story? A story promoted and implemented by governments that take about 80% of your earnings in one way or another. Remember, about half of the money the government takes in taxes goes directly from the government to international megabanks and privately owned financial institutions to pay interest on borrowing the national debt.
That debt money was created by those banks out of thin air. Let us remind you that the international private banking cartel of banking families is predominantly Jewish (Kazarian). Is it just a coincidence that all the main promoters of the banker-funded feminist movement, and the most prominent feminists ever, were dozens of Jews?
These women include Gloria Steinem, Andrea Dworkin, Betty Friedan, Eve Ensler, Rosa Luxemburg, Blu Greenberg, Judy Cohen, Gertrude Stein, Helen Cohen, Jean Rothernberg, Lisa Goldberg, Madelaine Stern, Ruth Ginsburg, Ruth Morgenthau, etc. if you look on the web page of the Jewish Womens Archive, you will be presented with a list of key Jewish (Kazarian) feminists that includes 1,193 profiles.
Goal 6: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all
Translation: Privatize all water sources, don’t forget to add fluoride (hydrofluorosilicate, which is an industrial by-product and toxin) and aluminum (which is extremely toxic to humans).
Goal 7: Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all
Translation: smart grid control of your energy access. Smart meters that emit electromagnetic field radiation are mandatorily inserted into your home to access your data and impose peak prices etc.
They will never tell you about the huge energy and environmental costs of building a smart grid, hundreds of millions of “smart meters”, billions of smart devices such as TVs, refrigerators, smart phones, smart cars, etc.
Goal 8: Promote sustainable, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all
Maintain economic growth per capita in accordance with national conditions, especially at least 7% of gross domestic product per year in the least developed countries.
Supporting development-oriented policies… including access to financial services
An attempt to separate economic growth from environmental degradation
Translation: Continuation of a usurious economy where wealth always flows upwards into the private banking system. “GDP growth of at least 7% in the least developed countries” means that the globalists want these economies to grow under the impact of globalization so that these countries can pay huge amounts of interest to international mega-banks for bogus loans created out of thin air.
GDP growth is always needed to keep the huge sums of interest collected through taxes flowing from governments to the private international banking cartel. Free trade zones, as promoted by the UN, would favor the interests of mega-corporations, globalization and endless polluting forms of GDP growth.
Is “free trade” really free or is it just a fancy word for corporate globalization?
The UK government’s Sustainable Development Strategy states that “internationally we must promote mutual support for trade liberalisation…” but environmentalists have traditionally taken a strong stance against free trade.
The concept of trade liberalization has always been a controversial issue from an environmental point of view due to the unnecessary shipping of goods around the world that could be produced locally. This also includes the export of manufacturing jobs to stores throughout the so-called developing countries, which leads to the suppression of opportunities and income in the importing country to achieve the so-called economic equality, which is actually illusory.
“Trying to decouple economic growth from environmental degradation” means that although it has been comprehensively demonstrated that 30 years of trying to decouple economic growth from environmental impact has failed miserably and is a policy that will never succeed. let’s keep repeating this separation nonsense to pretend we’re trying to stop the “real” pollution.
Goal 10: Reduce inequality within and between countries
Promote official development assistance and financial flows, including foreign direct investment to… especially developing countries
Reduce the transaction costs of migrant remittances to less than 3 percent by 2030 and eliminate remittance corridors with costs higher than 5 percent.
Translation: “Development aid” means that developing countries get loans with debt money (created out of thin air) and pledge their national assets as collateral. Then pull the plug later with a boom-bust-bailout scenario, as has happened in many other countries, and leave the country in perpetual debt bondage.
Almost every government in the world is heavily in debt to the private debt money banking system, see the book The Demon Economy.
We globalists want to have the whole world under the thumb of globalization. We don’t want people to develop “true local sustainability” in their country or to know how to do it. Instead, we want large numbers of people displaced, subject to migration from organized wars, and living in our “smart” cities as slaves to a globalized economy owned by our megabanks and megacorporations.
Goal 11: Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
Translation: You have a “Big Brother” state of Big Data surveillance and a behavior-based digital social lending system to keep you under our control. This is already working in China, where more than 200 million surveillance cameras have been installed by 2018, and more than 600 million are planned.
The UN’s 2030 Agenda and smart cities promoted by the WEF are smart for the so-called big powers, but not smart for you. In addition, sustainable development, as defined in the 2030 Agenda, includes the mass adoption and use of so-called smart technologies.
This includes wireless technology such as WIFI, smartphones, 5G, smart meters and the so-called “Internet of Things”, etc. However, thousands of studies, see Endnote, have clearly shown that the above wireless technologies use electromagnetic frequencies (EMF) that can harm human health, and especially the brain development of children. In these studies, EMF has been linked to chronic fatigue, headaches, tinnitus, depression, cancer, and chronic degenerative disorders.
Smart cities will use a social credit rating that is already used in China and requires a large collection of data on each citizen. In China, for example, financial transactions, organizational affiliation, social interactions, friendships and the collection of data on the history of citizens on social networks are collected.
The surveillance network is an integral part of the data collection process. For example, a person’s social credit score depends on whether the person criticizes the government or obeys the government – therefore each person is forced to obey the government in order to maintain their social credit rating and receive benefits. It is a kind of digital dictatorship. Chinese authorities are even reported to be using “pre-crime” algorithms based on collected data.
In these UN-planned smart cities, the right to privacy is completely undermined as people are expected to consent to the collection of their data and constant monitoring of their activities under the guise of crime prevention.
A smart city requires wireless connectivity to function, and this is the real reason why 5G is being rapidly rolled out around the world. Even when the so-called pandemic was in full swing and everyone else was locked down, employees of communications companies deploying 5G infrastructure were working full time.
Thus, 5G enables “smart city” supercomputers to analyze the activities of an entire city of people in real time and use geospatial intelligence to monitor and manage large crowds of people, ostensibly for reasons such as improving flow. customers. Spending trillions of dollars on tracking technology and infrastructure to improve customer flow – am I the only one who doesn’t buy it?
Goal 12: Ensure sustainable models of consumption and production
*Recognizing that the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change is the primary international intergovernmental forum for negotiating the global response to climate change.
Translation: Forced austerity, limited access to resources and higher taxation of people under the guise of fighting man-made climate change and other SCP policies – meanwhile our mega-corporations continue to fill and pollute the natural world, for example to produce many millions of batteries for electric cars.
And by the way, don’t forget, the UN framework is the only place you can discuss the issue of climate change – we don’t want scientists meeting outside of our fake UN climate change framework. Books such as Transcending the Climate Change Deception Toward Real Sustainability and Climate CO2 Hoax describe how thousands of scientists dispute the unproven climate change theory promoted by the UN, but the UN does not tell the public about it.
The above books also describe other deceptive aspects of our UN principles that are not open to debate, such as:
failure of resource efficiency, resource substitution or environmental efficiency strategies;
the UN ploy to blame population growth instead of addressing the root causes of environmental destruction and human poverty worldwide, i.e. the privately owned global debt money banking system that was instrumental in creating the unelected UN and the system of ecologically destructive corporate globalization on first place’
Brundtland’s definition of sustainable development in the UN actually allowed “polluting” forms of globalization/GDP growth to continue unchecked.
Goal 13: Take urgent action to combat climate change and its effects
Integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies and planning.
Improve education, awareness raising and human and institutional capacity for climate change mitigation, adaptation, mitigation and early warning.
Translation: This is simply promoting globalist policies eg Cap and Trade, Carbon Taxes/Credits and Ecological Footprint Taxes. We globalists are trying to change your society to suit our agendas, and you will have no say in how your society functions. We are trying to indoctrinate your children and society at large to believe our lies about man-made climate change so that we can gain total control over society as well as manipulate the behavior of society and the population as we wish without any resistance.
Goal 14: Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels
Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related deaths everywhere.
Promote the rule of law at the national and international level and ensure equal access to justice for all.
By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows… and fight all forms of organized crime.
Expand and strengthen the participation of developing countries in global governance institutions.
By 2030, provide legal identity to everyone, including birth registration.
translation: “Significantly reduce all forms of violence and related mortality everywhere” means, except when we globalists do it – i.e. carry out violence and depopulation through deliberately organized wars, the mass sale of toxic vaccines, the spread of drug culture, human trafficking networks and the promotion of mass abortion.
In these terrible wars (economics of destruction) both sides have secured funds, our military-industrial corporations make untold billions from the sale of weapons, military technology and equipment; and our mega-corporations secure huge post-war infrastructure rebuilding contracts.
It means we want you to follow our laws, even if you didn’t write them.
Significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows” means, in addition to our corporate “legitimate” military-industrial complex that supplies weapons to our member governments, notably the US, Israel, Russia, China, the UK, France, Germany and the G20, which we own and control.
It means that we globalists want all developing countries (i.e. poorer countries whose people are particularly burdened by debt and whose resources are used by corporate globalization) to be subjected to and governed by our institutions of global governance, i.e. the unelected UN, WHO. , World Bank, IMF, WTO, etc.
It means that we globalists want everyone to register so we know where you are and so we can tax you. This is the rationale behind digital identifiers. Note that at the UN conference in 2016, Bill Gates was able to present his rationale for the introduction of digital ID cards in the 16th SDG sub-goals, which according to some sources will most likely be injected via vaccines, and trials have been conducted in the third world .
Remember that we “globalists” think we own you and you “ordinary people” are nothing more than a government guarantee for loans your government received from our international private banking cartel – money we own and they were never – created out of thin air through our debt system.
Goal 15: Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development
Strengthen the mobilization of domestic resources, including international support to developing countries, with the aim of improving domestic capacities to collect taxes and other revenues.
Assist developing countries in achieving long-term debt sustainability through coordinated policies aimed at promoting debt financing, debt forgiveness and debt restructuring, where appropriate, and resolving the external debt of highly indebted poor countries to reduce the debt problem.
Support the development, transfer, dissemination and dissemination of environmentally friendly technologies to developing countries under favorable conditions, including preferential and preferential conditions, as mutually agreed.
Strengthen international support for the implementation of effective and targeted capacity building in developing countries to support national plans for the implementation of all sustainable development goals…
To promote universal, rules-based, open, non-discriminatory and fair multilateral trading systems within the World Trade Organization…
Encourage and promote effective partnerships between the public and private sectors and civil society, building on the experiences and strategies of resource partnerships.
By 2020, intensify capacity-building support for developing countries… to significantly increase the availability of high-quality, timely and reliable data disaggregated by income, sex, age, race, ethnicity, migration status, disability, geographic location…
Translation: Depriving people around the world of the ability to decide how to live their lives and imposing global authority, mega-corporation influence and the bloated unelected bureaucracy of international institutions, including the UN, the World Economic Forum and public-private (corporate) partnerships.
17.1. means that we globalists want to collect more taxes than everyone else.
17.4 means we don’t really care who in the world is heavily in debt – even if the debt is restructured, it doesn’t matter. We don’t care as long as developing countries remain beholden to the mega banks and financial institutions of our private banking cartel and continue to be on the hook. The one thing we will never do is write off the debt – if we ever do, it will be the introduction of control conditionality. If we implement a single world digital currency and cancel your national debt, you will have to give up ownership of your assets, as stated in our marketing document on the World Economic Forum website…
“Welcome to 2030: I own nothing, I have no privacy, and life has never been better.”
We globalists want developing countries dependent on contracts and debt to pay for our corporate technologies that leave them dependent on the globalized corporate system we control.
Never allow countries, regions or communities to develop true local self-sufficiency, locally appropriate technologies or inter-technologies that meet their local needs and can be sustained in the long term from local resources, local labour, local skills and local knowledge. .
It means that we put international pressure on these poorer countries to accept and implement our delusional plans.
It means that the WTO governs world trade. We, the globalists, run the WTO and create the rules of trade. We say it’s fair, but you have to follow our business rules, which are economic tricks based on a currency system we own and control.
It means that we globalists must ensure that corporate (private) influence in politics is effective so that we can control the levers of the political system. Civil society has little money compared to the mega-corporations of the world, so corporate and financial institutions will have the greatest influence.
It means that in our system of globalization we want to know everything about everyone so that we can exploit or manipulate the masses as we see fit – just like a farmer keeps a registration card for every cow on his farm, we have a card for all of you.
